Npt Bushing

Why is Bush supporting nuclear ambitions of India when they have not signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation?

"http://www.heritage.org/Research/MissileDefense/bg1935.cfm Today, 187 countries are signatories to the notable exception of Cuba, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea, which has withdrawn in 2003. "It seems cons-intuitive to me that we support a country that does not sign the NPT, but we also try to achieve non-proliferation world. "The initiative of the Bush administration to sell civilian nuclear technology to India, de facto state with nuclear weapons, is a historic decision that will have a broad and lasting impact on the nuclear non-proliferation international. "If a couple of you idiots would stop implying biased things you would have realized that I did not compare India with Iran or N. Korea.

The NPT is completely biased in favor of P5 (U.S., UK, France, Russia, China). Now that the P5 have tested hundreds of nuclear bombs they preach that others do not have the right to make nuclear weapons. The P5 hundreds of nuclear reactors have only 12 under IAEA safeguards. And they expect others nations to keep each and every one of its reactors under safeguards. The P5 can withdraw the remaining 12 reactors under safeguards at any time they want. No need for any type of notice. And they expect other nations to have safeguards in perpetuity. Except for P5 no state can make nuclear weapons. One of the main pillars of the NPT is to reduce inventory Nuke. The P5 will preach about the other should reduce / destroy their nuclear weapons, but they have not done themselves. One article, the signatories should move towards full disarmament Nuke. I do not make any P5 that. On the other hand U.S. is developing or developed weapons that cause more destruction than nuclear bombs. Why a Such a distinction is valid? And what makes btw u trust your own U.S. govt with nuclear weapons? Because in the history of the world that they are the only to be used and which has caused unimaginable devastation and loss of life. Indirectly, for decades in view of the radiation and the effects drop a Nuke. India is already a nuclear power. Without American aid. The "nuclear ambitions" would proceed independently of this Agreement. India is holding 14 out of its 22 reactors under safeguards. The United States has maintained or even 20% of its reactors under safeguards? If if your concerned about the proliferation and Disarmament Nuke why not start u at home? Practice what you preach. Ask the U.S. govt to arrest produce nuclear weapons, weapons more powerful than nuclear bombs. Stop making all ballistic missiles, etc..? Then u can go to lecture. I do not think u ever heard of nuclear weapons proliferate India? Do u? If you want the non-proliferation do u have the courage to attack me or unequivocally condemn / stop all trade with Pakistan, China, etc., where Iran and North Korea got nukes? The NPT said that all states should move towards complete disarmament. Has the U.S. done? If the U.S. were neighbors with countries like Iran, North Korea or any other hostile nuclear state with which the U.S. has had wars, never take anything the United States to nuke disarmament? Since you does not compare Iran with India, you are well aware of the different histories of the two. In India, the United States are a reliable ally in the war against terrorism and as a balance to China. Hence the transaction.